Technology latest news

Just another technology weblog

SEATTLE - A jury on Friday ordered Microsoft Corp. to pay $367.4 million to Alcatel-Lucent for infringing on two patents, a decision the software maker vowed to appeal.

The U.S. District Court jury in San Diego found that handwriting recognition technology in Microsoft’s Tablet PC operating system infringed on pattern recognition patents held by Paris-based Alcatel-Lucent.

The jury also decided that some of Microsoft’s programs, including the Outlook e-mail application and the Windows Mobile operating system, infringed on an Alcatel-Lucent patent in the way users select calendar dates from a menu.

“We do not believe the jury’s verdict against Microsoft on the two user interface patents is supported by the facts or the law,” said Tom Burt, a deputy general counsel at Microsoft, in a statement. “We will move immediately to have the two verdicts against Microsoft overturned.”

Microsoft, however, was found not to have infringed on a video decoding patent related to the way the Windows operating system plays DVDs.

Alcatel-Lucent spokeswoman Mary Lou Ambrus said the company was disappointed with the video patent decision.

The case decided Friday was just one of many stemming from 15 patent claims made in 2003 by Lucent Technologies Inc. against PC makers Gateway Inc. and Dell Inc. for technology developed by Bell Labs, Lucent’s research arm. Alcatel bought Lucent in 2006.

In 2003, Microsoft added itself to the list of defendants to protect its PC-maker partners, saying the patents were closely tied to its Windows operating system.

A judge threw out two of the 2003 patent claims and scheduled six separate trials to consider the remaining disputes, in which the PC makers remain defendants. Those were later condensed into four trials.

One of the remaining trials is scheduled to begin April 22 in San Diego. At that time, Microsoft said it will also make nine of its own patent claims against Alcatel-Lucent.

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A former Sprint Nextel (S.N) executive has sued the No. 3 mobile service provider for wrongful dismissal, saying that she was fired after claiming Nextel Partners artificially pumped up sales data prior to its acquisition by Sprint, according to the Wall Street Journal.

Joanne Marie Toledo Hamm, who oversaw Sprint's integration of Nextel Partners in Hawaii, sued Sprint Nextel on Thursday in First Circuit Court in Honolulu. The allegations of fraudulent sales reporting at Nextel Partners could raise questions about whether Sprint overpaid for Nextel in 2006, the paper said in a story published on its Web site on Friday.

Nextel Partners was an affiliate of Nextel Communications Inc, which Sprint acquired in 2005.

The suit alleges that employees of Nextel Partners ordered phones for customers without their consent to inflate sales numbers, which improved the appearance of Partners' results and in turn increased the price that Sprint eventually paid to acquire it.

To mask the fraudulent sales, the suit alleges, the phones were essentially shipped from one part of Nextel Partners' warehouse to another, and credits were issued to cover the cost of the equipment and services on customers' bills.

Hamm alleged the practice extended beyond Hawaii, the paper said. In the lawsuit, she claimed she completed an investigation into the activity in late 2006 and brought it to the attention of her supervisor, who “actively discouraged” her from doing anything about the issue.

Sprint spokeswoman Leigh Horner told Reuters on Friday Hamm's dismissal “stems from multiple complaints and her behavior and violations of Sprint Nextel's code of conduct.”

(Reporting by Franklin Paul and Ritsuko Ando; Editing by Gary Hill)

San Francisco - Enterprises don't want to have to use two different management systems to support mobile devices in the warehouse and smartphones for executives, and so Good Technology, with sister company Symbol, plans to offer products that can support all types of mobile devices.

“A Symbol device on the loading dock doesn't have the same security policies and applications as smartphones, but you don't need two products to manage them,” said Brian Havener, group product manager at Motorola's Enterprise Mobility team.

In the coming months, Good plans to unveil more products and services that let an enterprise manage devices from the “shop floor to the corner office” using the same systems, he said.

Since

Apple's revision to the smallest member of its Wi-Fi equipment line-up–the AirPort Express–seems to fit neatly in the consumer space. But the $99 device, refreshed a few days ago after spending four years fixed in time, hides business features in its compact form. Like all Apple wireless hardware, the Express can be configured and used equally well by Windows XP and Vista as by the various flavors of Mac OS X.

The Express is small, hangs directly off a power outlet (a separate A/V kit with an extender plug is available), and is designed to be portable. It has a single Ethernet jack, a USB slot, and a combo analog/optical digital audio output port. The USB slot can share a single printer. The idea is that you can use the Express as your main base station in a wirelessly enabled home, where the Express plugs into a broadband modem; or as an extension to a network elsewhere.

This is where the Express may shine. The Express packs the Wi-Fi certified draft-N version of 802.11n into its compact frame, and the cheapest device to offer both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz support; similarly priced hardware from other makers are 2.4 GHz only. The 5 GHz flavor of draft-N uses a relatively uncrowded spectrum band and can span the equivalent of two normal Wi-Fi channels for raw throughput up to 300 Mbps or real world speeds of 100 to 150 Mbps. Reports indicate that the Express more modestly may range from 50 to 100 Mbps; this is still far better than 802.11g, and you get the better range, to boot.

Most laptops offer draft-N as an upgrade option, and most support both spectrum bands for flexibility, which could make the Express an easy route for supporting faster connections from newer computers. (All of Apple's laptops have included 802.11n in 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz since Oct. 2006.)Because the Express–like nearly all modern base stations–supports roaming when you use the same network name as other access points on the same network, you could place one or more Express routers at the edges of an existing network linked up via Ethernet. (No gigabit Ethernet; just 10/100 Mbps. You're shaving a bit of your top speed off, but you're also keeping costs down.)The audio output is individually addressable for each unit from within iTunes, allowing you to stream music to a stereo or powered speakers under Windows or Mac OS X. A third-party package, AirFoil, offers Windows and Mac OS X support for streaming any audio to an Express, or even to other Mac or Windows systems.The Express seems nearly like a toy, but it can also work as a cheap way to beef up coverage.

HAVANA (Reuters) - Independent Cuban blogger Yoani Sanchez, who chronicles the woes of life in communist-run Cuba, was awarded one of Spain's top journalism awards on Friday, the Ortega and Gasset prize for digital journalism.

Spanish newspaper El Pais, which awards the prize annually, said Sanchez won it for her “shrewdness” in overcoming hurdles to freedom of expression in Cuba, her “vivacious” style and her drive to join the “global space of citizen journalism.”

Her “Generacion Y” blog is the most popular blog posted from Cuba (http://www.desdecuba.com/generaciony/).

It received 1.2 million hits in February for its Web page on a server in Germany.

“This is great encouragement for Cuban bloggers who are still at an embryonic stage,” she told Reuters by telephone from her home in Havana.

“It recognizes that Cuban blogs can be a parallel source of information, reflection and opinions independent from Cuba's official media,” the 32-year-old philologist said.

Sanchez has drawn considerable readership by writing about her daily life and describing the economic hardships and political constraints in her country.

Sanchez said she started her blog as a therapy to “let out frustrations,” and write about the Cuba that never gets into the official press.

She has criticized Cuba's new President Raul Castro, who succeeded his ailing brother Fidel Castro last month, for his minimal steps to improve the standard of living of Cubans.

“Who is the last in line for a toaster?” was the title of a recent blog that satirized the lifting of a ban on sales of computers, DVD players and other appliances that Cubans long for, though toasters will not be freely sold until 2010.

In a country where the press is government-controlled and no independent media exists, Sanchez and other Cubans bloggers have found a new vehicle of expression, even though access to the Internet is controlled by the state.

The younger Castro has encouraged more public debate on Cuba's shortcomings in a drive to shore up socialism.

(Reporting by Rosa Tania Valdes, editing by Todd Eastham)

(For special coverage from Reuters on the changes in Cuba, see: http://www.reuters.com/news/globalcoverage/cuba)

AT&T and Verizon Wireless will be using their new spectrum licenses to move into next-generation wireless technology, according to recent announcements by both companies. AT&T and Verizon bid about $16 billion for the new licenses in a recent auction by the Federal Communications Commission that many observers described as a “once-in-a-lifetime” opportunity.

4G Services

AT&T said Thursday that its successful bids for the B block will give it the capacity “to meet customer needs as the company moves to higher-speed” fourth generation, or 4G, services.

It added that the new 700-MHz spectrum from the auction, along with other licenses it recently acquired, will cover 100 percent of the top 200 markets in the U.S. and 87 percent of the entire U.S. population. The new licenses, the company said, will allow customers to do more with their wireless devices and will lead to wireless connectivity being embedded in more devices.

The newer technologies will include LTE, or Long Term Evolution, and HSPA+, providing peak speeds of 100 Mbps or more. By the end of this year, AT&T said, it is planning on delivering 3G to about 350 leading U.S. markets.

Verizon Wireless said Friday that its new spectrum licenses will also allow it to roll out a new generation of wireless services. According to news reports, the company said its next-generation network will launch as early as 2010, also using LTE. Chairman and CEO Ivan Seidenberg reportedly described the spectrum acquisition as “nothing short of a transformative experience” for the company.

Verizon said its objectives in the auction had included filling in gaps in its current wireless coverage, such as in Los Angeles and Atlanta. Its newly acquired C-block spectrum has open-access conditions, imposed by the FCC after a lobbying effort by an alliance led by Google. These conditions mean that third-party devices and software will be able to work on those frequencies.

Seidenberg told news media Friday that the conditions are fine, since the company's thinking about open architecture “goes much beyond anything” the FCC might have in mind.

Bidding Against Themselves

Bill Ho, an analyst with industry research firm Current Analysis, said Verizon's and AT&T's plans for their new licenses were “not a surprise,” He added that LTE can offer “tremendous” range and speed.

As for Google, it is now confirming that its goals included triggering the open-access provisions for the C block. On its Public Policy Blog, Google counsels Richard Whitt and Joseph Faber wrote Thursday that the company had been prepared to pay a price “somewhat higher than the reserve price” of $4.6 billion, which had to be reached in order to trigger the open-access conditions.

“But it was clear,” they wrote, “that Verizon Wireless ultimately was motivated to bid higher.” All bids were anonymous during the auction and made by phone and the Internet.

In fact, the Google lawyers revealed, “in 10 of the bidding rounds we actually raised our own bid — even though no one was bidding against us — to ensure aggressive bidding on the C block.”

MIAMI (Reuters) - Microsoft Corp. Chairman Bill Gates credited the Internet on Friday with making “phenomenal” inroads in beefing up government transparency, saying cabinet ministers in Scandinavia now keep little, if anything, private.

“The Nordic countries, with Sweden and Denmark, have really taken it to an amazing level,” Gates told a conference on Latin American government, ahead of an annual Inter-American Development Bank meeting in Miami.

“Whenever a (Nordic cabinet) minister goes out to lunch, you can see how much he spent for lunch and how much on the cab. It literally goes up (on the Internet) within a few hours,” he said.

He was referring to detailed postings tracking daily business on government Web sites, which include everything from cabinet ministers' calendars to budgets and real-time accounts of the bidding for lucrative government contracts.

“Every bid that's ever done, the bidders come up on the networks, you see the terms they offer,” said Gates, still referring to the new, Web-savvy operating procedures in places like Sweden.

“It's a very open, transparent bidding process,” he said, adding that the “things about government that really count” were now accessible to anyone with a personal computer.

“There's still a lot that can be done there,” Gates said. He credited Nordic countries with ensuring, however, that virtually all key government information was now posted online for viewing by the general public.

“I think it's been phenomenal. I think the quality of governance has improved, and can improve a lot more, because of that Internet transparency,” said Gates.

He said a lot of government data are also available in the United States online, but they are often too complicated by jargon and difficult to navigate through for most users.

“This is one where the Nordic countries are the best …. We're not the model for that particular effort,” said Gates.

Gates is due to leave his day-to-day functions at Microsoft and dedicate himself to the philanthropic efforts of the Gates Foundation in June.

(Reporting by Tom Brown, editing by Jim Loney, Richard Chang)

San Francisco - Hasso Plattner of SAP and Marc Benioff of Salesforce.com squared off in a debate Thursday over which company has the best platform to run a company's business.

The event, at the Computer History Museum in Silicon Valley, was billed as a debate over the future of enterprise software, although it never really tackled that question. Quentin Hardy of Forbes magazine asked the questions, and the two executives argued the merits of Salesforce.com's on-demand platform and SAP's traditional on-premise model.

Benioff, the chairman and CEO of Salesforce.com, was often faster on his feet than Plattner, an SAP co-founder and chairman of its supervisory board. A few times, Benioff antagonized Plattner, who glared moodily off to the side.

“I want to figure out how to get SAP to build on our platform,” Benioff said. “They've had trouble getting into on-demand, and they don't have any major customers yet. So when I look at that I say, 'How do I help them make it happen?' They need to write their apps on our platform, because they're never going to figure this out.”

“Don't overestimate your platform; the ship can sink,” Plattner said later. “I'd like to give you some advice, but I don't know if you'll take it, because you are a bit younger.”

The debate began calmly enough. Benioff said we are witnessing “the creation of a new enterprise software industry … built around some fundamental principles that are different from the previous era.” Those principles are embodied by Google, eBay, and Amazon.com, he said, which deliver loosely coupled services,

BOSTON - Leaving a copyrighted song where others can get at it with peer-to-peer software doesn’t constitute a copyright violation until someone downloads it, a federal judge said in a record industry lawsuit against college students.

The Boston judge’s comments in a Monday pretrial ruling conflict with statements, also made Monday, by a New York federal judge that leaving a copyrighted file accessible could be illegal, even if nobody downloads it.

At issue in both cases is whether people who initially download or own copyrighted music are legally liable if they leave music files accessible to be shared by others. Peer-to-peer sharing services allow computer users to make files on their PCs available to a multitude of other users.

“Both of these rulings are important because it is the first time judges have thoroughly analyzed these questions,” said Fred von Lohmann, a staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a San Francisco-based nonprofit and online free-speech advocate that filed briefs as an interested party in both cases.

Neither judge questioned that copy infringement occurs when people using peer-to-peer software search the Internet for a particular piece of music and then download it without authorization.

However, Judge Nancy Gertner of Boston found that “merely exposing music files to the Internet is not copyright infringement.” The student-defendants could claim “they did not know that logging onto the peer-to-peer network would allow others to access these particular files,” Gertner wrote.

But Judge Kenneth Karras in New York, ruling in a case against a single computer user, said just placing a copyrighted music file in a computer folder shared by peer-to-peer software users could amount to illegal publication of it.

The music industry has sued more than 30,000 people for illegal downloading, many of them college students using university Internet services. Many of the cases have been settled by the defendants agreeing to pay record companies a few thousand dollars apiece.

Some of the defendants may never have known whether anyone else downloaded the music they put in shared folders.

Gertner temporarily blocked record companies from seeking the identities of Boston University students they suspect have downloaded music illegally. The record companies that brought the case are trying to identify the students through their addresses on the university’s computer network.

“It’s important to note that the decision is not final,” the Recording Industry Association of America said in a statement regarding Gertner’s ruling. “The court has put forth a specific process to address its concerns before the relevant information is transferred to us. We’re confident that the court will ultimately allow us to obtain the identifying information, as have courts across the country in similar cases.”

Raymond Sayeg, a defense attorney representing students in the Boston University case, called Gertner’s finding “a landmark decision that will change how these cases go forward…. The level of proof has gone up significantly.”

If courts maintain that a copyright violation occurs only when a music file is downloaded, record companies would have to track down evidence that downloads occur and who is involved, von Lohmann said.

“The industry doesn’t want to be put to the trouble to prove that someone actually downloaded it from you,” he said.

San Francisco - When Apple CEO Steve Jobs announced that the iPhone was ready for enterprise use, the announcement caused a stir that few of the world's iconic businessmen could match. It seemed that everyone from rank-and-file worker-bees to CEOs wanted to get their corporate applications served up on the hot new device. Why? This was Apple — a synonym for awe-inspiring design and coolness, the antithesis to stodgy old corporate technology that burns the eyes red and freezes computers blue.

But some Apple-watchers and evangelist IT practitioners who use Macs for business think the announcement runs deeper than the iPhone itself in its importance. Some believe it could usher in the era of a more enterprise-friendly Apple.

Such a paradigm shift, they argue, could serve as the final ingredient in the boiling cauldron being stirred by employees at the edge of organizations who have become dissatisfied with corporate technology and who have turned to innovative options in the consumer space to meet their needs.

Some tall hurdles related to converting an enterprise from PCs to Macs, of course, have been around for years. Many corporate IT departments find themselves beholden to decisions made by predecessors during the 1990s, when PCs and the Microsoft Windows operating system seized a chokehold on the corporate market. Companies planned everything from back-end servers to client software based on a Microsoft framework, notes Roger Kay, an analyst with EndPoint Technologies.

Integrating Mac equipment and other Apple products into such an environment requires time and money. “Despite the hairiness of Microsoft software, most companies crave compatibility with it,” Kay says. “They have these existing investments that they want to get use of.”

But a move to Web-based software, where users need nothing but a browser to access their applications, could alleviate the IT hang-up on integration.

Employees have been leading this movement. Instead of using the corporate-sanctioned software on their workstations, many have gravitated to technologies like wikis, blogs, and social networks to collaborate on projects horizontally, without IT's help or blessing. In the CIO Consumer Technology survey , the 311 IT decision makers surveyed conceded that nearly 25 percent of their employees use social networks for work purposes, while 21 percent utilize wikis and another 17 percent use blogs.

From a hardware perspective, Macs have increasingly become more people's brand of choice. Apple shipped 2.3 million Macs in the first quarter of 2008, which represented a 44 percent unit growth for the product and helped Apple realize 47 percent revenue growth compared to the same quarter the year before.

But businesses' adoption of Macs and Apple software has still been sluggish, perhaps, in part, due to this being a low priority for Apple.

While Apple of course deals with businesses, and has a business team at some of its stores, it undoubtedly remains a consumer-oriented company, by the numbers. Its iPod claims around 70 percent of the market share for MP3 players. Apple sold 22.1 million iPods in the first quarter of 2008. On average, the company says, an iPod has been sold every 1.7 seconds in the five-and-half-year life span of the product.

And evangelists who run Mac shops in SMBs say their experiences, not as dissimilar to those of large enterprises as you might believe, still demonstrate a mixed bag of results for those using Apple in the corporate setting.

The wholesale switchShani Magosky, chief operating officer (with IT responsibilities) of Jaffe Associates, a 25-person marketing and public relations firm, didn't need the iPhone to embrace Apple.

Magosky started looking into Macs for her traditionally PC and Windows-based company back in the fall of 2006, she says. She wasn't necessarily wooed by Bono singing in an iPod commercial. She was sick of PCs breaking all the time, she says. Then there was the “sticker shock” of learning what it would cost her to upgrade to Microsoft's SharePoint collaboration software (and the accompanying server technology).

Specifically, she'd been running an outdated version of Microsoft's terminal server, which allowed her employees (all of whom work remotely, as Jaffe has no central office) to connect to the network and share files. “It was unnecessarily slow and unreliable,” she says. “We ended up spending a fortune on IT trouble-shooting.”

With her terminal server being outdated, she was told the best option would be to upgrade to SharePoint, which, after purchasing and installing the server, buying the software licenses and all the support surrounding it, would have cost $100,000, Magosky says. “They nickel and dime you,” she says.

Meanwhile, PCs became a costly problem. Between what Magosky views as poor manufacturing and tons of malware permeating the layer Windows leaves between the Web and the network, the PCs began to break with great frequency, she says. “There is just so much that can go wrong with them. All these viruses happen to PCs that don't happen to Macs. And then it costs you more to fix it than just buying a new one. So I said I wasn't going to waste anymore, and went out and bought a MacBook Pro.”

Perhaps serendipitously, right around this time, her boss, President and CEO Jay Jaffe, was on vacation with his daughter in San Francisco and visited Apple's flagship store on Stockton Street. “He bought an iPod touch that he was infatuated with,” says Magosky. “When he was there, he talked to the business team. They convinced him there was nothing we needed to do now that we couldn't do with them [Apple].”

Before long, Magosky set about switching her entire shop over to Macs. Since Jaffe Associates serves the legal industry, which makes wide use of Microsoft software, Jaffe began using Office 2008 for Macs. The company also chose Apple's Kerio software for e-mail, Entourage for archiving, and Apple's Xserve server for back-end storage of data. Magosky predicts that Jaffe will realize a savings of 50 percent in maintenance costs due to the Apple switch, which will pay for the hardware and implementation of Apple products in the first year, she says.

Third-party Mac support, by the hour, remains more costly than Windows support. But, Magosky says, her total amount of required support time has dropped so substantially that she's gaining that 50 percent in savings.

“It's going to increase the efficiency of our staff tremendously,” she says. “On top of the hard dollar savings, it's going to free me up to do other, more value-added things.” What about those cool iPhones? While Jaffe's users primarily use RIM BlackBerry devices for mobile needs, Magosky says that she might consider iPhones down the road, if enough users call for them.

Hurdles remainDitching PCs at a 25-person company is one thing. But introducing Apple to a large enterprise with legacy systems is quite another. Even some enterprises who've been managing mixed Mac and PC environments for years say that Apple still has some work to do.

Rob Israel, manager of desktop support at Digitas, a New York-based ad agency, says that 30 percent of his company runs Macs. Israel, who manages some 600 Macs across the enterprise, says that a hybrid environment of Macs and Windows can have its pitfalls, technologically and culturally.

“We barely deploy Apple servers here even though the culture has become Macintosh friendly,” he says. “There is still a sense in the IT department that we are a Windows shop, and why bother complicating things by introducing more platforms.”

The IT shop runs four Apple Xserves, one of which is used to host Filemaker Pro.

While Israel describes the company's relationship with Apple in terms of contracts as “great,” the arrangement leaves some things to be desired, he says. “Apple does not provide technology roadmaps, which enterprise IT departments obviously need,” he says. “What's worse, they make their hardware incompatible with the previous version of the operating system, and their schedule is impossible to keep up with.”

For instance, Israel says Digitas can't deploy new versions of Leopard, Mac's operating system, as quickly as Apple demands. Every time Apple moves to the next version of an OS, Israel says, Digitas ends up having six months where they're forced to buy out-of-date equipment to stay compatible with the old OS. “We have complained about this for the last four years,” he explains. “They [Apple] do not have any motivation to design their new hardware to support an old OS, so they won't.”

Not quite a tipping pointApple's buzz could hardly be louder. But have we now reached a time when many large enterprises can consider doing a rip and replace, swapping PCs for Macs? Not likely, says Kay.

Even if a progressive CIO who felt his or her company had sunk too much money into Windows wanted to switch wholesale, gaining the initial capital to get the job done, especially as the economy tightens, could be difficult, he says. “It's hard to see a time when you can change the paradigm that much for computing,” Kay says.

For now, the iPhone might just be the starting point where businesses dip their toes in the Apple pool to see if the enterprise experience improves.

At New York Media (publishers of New York magazine and NYMag.com), Albert C. Lee, director of IT, says he has used Macs for some employees in the organization but has run into problems with service-level agreements. But that's not going to stop him from potentially adding iPhones to the enterprise when it the capability to access e-mail from a Microsoft Exchange server becomes possible in June.

“A good majority of our enterprise users already have an iPhone for a personal communications device,” he says. “The idea of empowering a large population of your corporate users with enterprise push e-mail and remote calendar management, especially when they had none before, is pretty attractive.”